Which method of quality assurance involves assessing outcomes at specific intervals?

The Surveillance Method is the appropriate choice when it comes to assessing outcomes at specific intervals. This method emphasizes continuous observation and monitoring of processes or products to ensure they meet quality standards. It allows for the collection of data and feedback over time, which facilitates timely adjustments and improvements based on the outcomes observed.

In the context of quality assurance, this method ensures that processes are not only checked at set points but also that the results are analyzed regularly, creating a rhythm of assessment that contributes to maintaining high standards. This ongoing scrutiny helps identify patterns or anomalies that might not be evident in a one-time inspection.

The other methods mentioned, while valuable in their own right, do not focus on regular interval assessments in the same way. For instance, Random Inspection involves selecting random samples for evaluation, which may not provide timely insights into ongoing performance. 100% Inspection refers to checking every single item produced, which can be resource-intensive and may not allow for ongoing adjustments based on interval assessments. Lastly, a Feedback Loop pertains more to user or stakeholder feedback and how that data is used for continuous improvement rather than systematic assessments over specified time frames.