Which method involves examining results and establishing a system for ongoing improvement in quality assurance?

The method that involves examining results and establishing a system for ongoing improvement in quality assurance is centered around the concept of reviewing results. This approach focuses on assessing the outcomes of processes, procedures, and product quality to identify areas that need enhancement. By carefully analyzing the data obtained from various tests or evaluations, organizations can pinpoint deficiencies and determine what adjustments or improvements are necessary.

Reviewing results is crucial in quality assurance because it fosters a culture of continuous improvement. It enables organizations to implement systematic changes and monitor their impact over time, thereby ensuring that quality standards are met and enhanced. This method is essential for building a feedback loop that informs future practices and strengthens the overall quality management system.

The other methods, while valuable in their own right, do not primarily focus on the systematic evaluation of results to drive quality improvement. Surveillance methods generally involve monitoring processes rather than analyzing outcomes. Starting to test implies initiating procedures without a focus on reviewing past results, and gathering feedback, while useful, is more about collecting opinions and insights rather than rigorously examining data to improve quality assurance frameworks.